PGAK
PartnersSign inCheck my cameras
Menu

EVIDENCE

Evidence you can inspect

Evidence should identify the function, conditions, date, method and limitations. A demonstration is not a measured customer result.

Evidence statusReviewed 2026-10-03

PGAK’s own recorded demonstrations

4 pieces of PGAK material are published, each with the conditions it was captured under and what it does not prove. They show a function running on a stated scene. None is an accuracy measurement, and none is presented as a customer’s endorsement.

No customer result or measured accuracy report is published yet, and the deployment scenarios elsewhere on the site are illustrations, not verified deployments.

Manufacturing — vehicle chassis lineAnalytics configured on a camera already fitted above the line

PPE check on an existing line camera

PPE check on an existing line camera14s · no soundBare hands are flagged on an assembly line. The box is drawn on the hand rather than the person, and the figure beside each label is the model's confidence, which changes from frame to frame. Low figures are left in deliberately: they are the sort of detection a supervisor should be checking, not one a system should act on by itself.
Conditions
Recorded on an existing overhead line camera; the clip's burned-in overlay reads 01-04-2023, 16:57. No camera was added for this.
What it does not prove
Gloves are one PPE class. Which classes apply to a site is confirmed at the assessment before anything is quoted.
Where this is discussed in more depth →
Warehouse — loading bayOne counting line configured on an existing dock camera

Sacks counted across a line at a loading bay

Sacks counted across a line at a loading bay16s · no soundAn evening unload. Each sack crossing the line is detected, given a tracking number so the same one is not counted twice, and added to a running total — the count climbs from four to seven while you watch.
Conditions
Recorded 19 December 2022 on an existing dock camera with a single counting line. The transport company's name and telephone numbers are blurred throughout; they belong to a third party.
What it does not prove
It counts a known item type across a line. It is not an inventory system and does not reconcile against a ledger.
Where this is discussed in more depth →
Commercial site — vehicle gateCamera mounted on the existing pillar; operator console at the gate

Plate reading fitted to an existing gate pillar

ANPR camera mounted on a gate pillar at a commercial site entrance
Two photographs show the camera fitted to an existing gate pillar and the gate operator console. They document this installation and its interface; they do not measure plate-reading performance.
Conditions
Photographed on site in daylight, with the camera mounted at roughly 1.5 metres. The image annotation refers to this installation and is not a universal height specification. Night performance and other camera positions are not demonstrated by this photograph.
What it does not prove
Plate-reading accuracy, missed reads and performance in other lighting or traffic conditions are not established by these photographs. Assess the camera view and software together, then measure representative vehicle passages at your site.
Where this is discussed in more depth →
Process plant — PGAK test setupTwo detection classes on one fixed elevated camera

Hot work flagged beside flammable storage

Hot work flagged beside flammable storage11s · no soundA worker runs an angle grinder along a pipe and the sparks carry across the floor. One box marks the hot work; a second marks three drums on a pallet, two carrying flammable hazard diamonds. Neither detection matters alone — what a safety officer wants to know is that both are in the same frame at the same moment.
Conditions
PGAK's own test setup, not a customer site. Burned-in overlay 18 February 2025 15:24:40, Camera 01, fixed elevated view, daylight. Camera model, working distance and detection confidence are not yet recorded and are stated as pending on the page rather than estimated.
What it does not prove
Detects an activity and a material class together. Does not know whether a hot-work permit was issued, does not measure distance, and is not a fire detection or suppression system.
Where this is discussed in more depth →

What a useful demonstration should establish

  • The supported function and exact software/processing configuration.
  • The source of the scene: customer deployment, permissioned lab test or illustration.
  • Camera/firmware settings, site conditions and relevant constraints.
  • What the operator sees, the evidence format, recipient and handling process.
  • False alerts, missed events and failures, with a denominator and test method for any measurement.
Use the test worksheet →

Illustrative deployment scenarios

The scenarios explain a possible approach. They are illustrations, separate from the recordings above and from any customer result.

Read labelled scenarios →